Overview of the In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR) Compliance
EU IVDR Compliance Guide: In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation
1. What is the IVDR EU 2017/746 ?
In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR) is an EU Regulation which lays down the criteria for safety, performance and quality of devices used to examine biological samples from humans, such as blood, tissue or urine samples. This new regulation has been replacing the previous In Vitro Diagnostic Directive (IVDD) since May 2022. The IVDR increases the standards of safety, performance, transparency and post market surveillance.
The In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation ensures patient safety and uniformity in the regulation throughout the EU MDR Consultant. Moreover, the IVDR includes a risk classification system, higher standards of clinical evidence, as well as greater involvement of Notified Bodies.
2. The Importance of IVDR Compliance for IVD Manufacturers
Without adhering to the IVDR Compliance you will not be able to sell your products on the EU market. The EU market is one of the largest markets in the world. The regulation prevents patients from faulty or misleading diagnostic devices.
Here are the reasons why you should comply with the IVDR regulation:
Market access: You have to adhere to the IVDR to sell your products in the EU.
Risk mitigation: By complying with the IVDR you will reduce risks of fines, expensive. Harm to your brand reputation.
Credibility & Trust: IVDR compliance builds the trust of physicians and patients.
Global alignment: In vitro diagnostic regulation is similar to other regulations in the world, making it easy to sell products globally.
To sum it all up, adhering to the IVDR compliance is not just a legal thing. It is mandatory to succeed.
3. Major Differences Between IVDD And IVDR
The In Vitro Diagnostic Regulations have a better regulated approach compared to the previous in vitro diagnostic directive. These include:
Aspect | IVDD (98/79/EC) | IVDR (2017/746) |
|---|---|---|
Classification | Annex II (List A & List B) specifies which devices require action from a Notified Body most others are certified. Reference: Directive (98/79/EC) Annex II (Lists A & B) is cited. | Moves to a risk based system using Classes A, B, C, and D. Reference: Regulation EU (2017/746), Article 47 and Annex VIII. |
Notified Bodies | The role is limited. We only need to look at Annex II List A, List B and self testing devices when it comes to Notified Body involvement. Reference: Directive 98/79/EC, Annexes III–VII, which talk about the ways to check conformity. | IVDs were self certified and NB involvement was limited. IVDR now mandates that all IVDs classified as Class B, C, or D require conformity assessment by a Notified Body Reference: This is because of the Regulation EU (2017/746), Articles 48 to 51 and Annex IX, to XI which talk about checking if they meet the rules. |
Performance Evaluation | Minimal requirement: device must achieve intended performance as declared by the manufacturer. Reference: Directive 98/79/EC, Annex III, 6 (The manufacturer shall ensure that the device achieves the performances. which the manufacturer has claimed for it). | Requires full performance evaluation, covering:
Documented in a PER. Reference: Regulation EU (2017/746), Articles 56–58 and Annex XIII. |
Technical Documentation | Basic technical file requirements, less detailed. Reference:Refer to Directive 98/79/EC, Annex IV–VII, and Annex III (EC statement of conformance). | Highly detailed, must needed : device description, risk management, benefit risk analysis, clinical evidence, PMS, etc. Reference: Regulation EU(2017/746), Article 10(4), Annex II & III. |
Post Market Surveillance | The manufacturers submitted cases to authority, but vigilance was reactive. No specific PMS requirements. Reference: Directive 98/79/EC and Article 10 (incident reporting). | Requires a proactive PMS system including:
Reference: Regulation EU (2017/746) - Articles 78–87, Annex III. |
The above changes reflect a bigger movement towards managing, evidential based in vitro diagnostic testing.
4. Which Devices Come Under The Scope Of The IVDR?
All devices that are used to test human specimens for medical purposes come under the scope of the IVDR regulation. These include:
In depth In Vitro Diagnostic Devices: blood glucose meters, pregnancy test kits, laboratory reagents
Self testing Devices: HIV and COVID-19 test kits
Companion Diagnostics: This Test is used to determine whether someone qualifies for treatment
Genetic Tests and Screening Devices
Software: if the software controls or influences the working of the IVD.
The manufacturers need to consider the intended use and the risk factor in order to group their devices as per the IVDR, which has a wider and more comprehensive scope than that of the In Vitro Diagnostic Device Directive.
5. Summary of Main Alterations to the Regulation of In Vitro Diagnostic Regulations.
Some regulatory procedures exist for In Vitro Diagnostic Regulations. These regulations provide people with certain time and give them more clarity so that they can continue marketing their In Vitro Diagnostic devices in the EU market. These regulations are intended to help people to get more clarity on how they can continue marketing In Vitro devices in the EU market.
Regulation | Main Highlights |
|---|---|
EU (2022/112) | - Initial extension of transition timelines for legacy IVDs - Transition periods introduced based on risk classification of devices |
EU (2023/503) | - Increased intervals for periodic review of notified bodies |
EU (2023/607) | - Elimination of the selloff period for devices already on the market during the transitional phase |
EU (2024/1860) | - Further extension of transitional timelines - Introduction of timelines for setting up a compliant quality management system under IVDR - Defined deadlines for signing and completing agreements with notified bodies - Gradual implementation of the EUDAMED system - Requirement to inform authorities in advance about planned discontinuation of device supply |
6. Classification of IVDs according to IVDR
IVDs according to IVDR are classified in four different groups.These groups include:
Group A: IVDs whose classification involves the risk associated with their use. These IVDs include laboratory devices and sample containers.
Group B: IVDs which involve risk as pregnancy tests and CRP tests.
Group C includes IVDs which have high risks such as tests for infectious diseases like Hepatitis B.
Group D includes IVDs with higher risks than those in other groups such as HIV tests or blood types which are done when individuals are getting blood transfusions.
The process of classifying these IVDs is dependent on the intended use of the IVDs, the risks they pose to the health of patients or the general public and the importance of information they provide. This type of classification is consistent with the global standards of device classification and ensures that these devices are evaluated taking the risks associated with them into consideration.
7. Role and Significance of Notified Bodies
Notified Bodies have an entirely new and vital role to play in terms of conformity assessment of IVDs under the IVDR regime. This represents a complete change of paradigm from the IVDD regime (Directive 98/79/EC), wherein self certification of IVDs was the norm. Under IVDR, all IVDs categorized as Class B, C, and D are required to undergo conformity assessment by a Notified Body, except in certain very limited cases of Class A devices.
Regulatory Background
Whereas, according to Article 48(10) of Regulation EU (2017/746)
The manufacturers of Class A medical devices that aren’t meant for assessing the performance must declare compliance of their devices with the regulation by providing the EU Declaration of Conformity according to Article 17 after compiling the documentation as stipulated in Annexes II and III.
8. IVDR Compliance Plan
To achieve compliance with IVDR, it's important to plan. You'll have to upgrade your quality system and generate many documents. Here is a plan for achieving IVDR compliance:
Perform Gap Assessment: Check systems, technical file, quality management system, claims related to products. Make a comparison with IVDR requirements. This action allows identifying gaps in such areas as Technical Documentation, Post Market Surveillance, Classification and conformity assessment. This step doesn't relate to any Annex but helps to identify gaps in relation to Annex II Annex III, Annex VIII and conformity assessment Annexes IX, X, XI.
Reclassify Devices: Every IVD should be reclassified according to risk classes A, B, C or D according to their intended use and risk to the patient. That is an essential change from list based classification under In Vitro Diagnostic Device Directive regulation.
Annex VIII – Provides information regarding the classification rules.
Article 47 – Introduces the risk based classification approach.
Devices Classes B-D require a Notified Body; only Class A non sterile can self declare.
Update the technical documentation: Technical file needs to be updated in accordance with the new requirements and structure.
Annex II – Specifies the required content of technical documentation.
Annex III – PMS documentation requirements (e.g. PMS Plan, PMS Report, PSUR)
Verify that documentation reflects safety, performance and benefit risk balance.
Upgrade the Quality Management System : Make sure that your Quality Management System is in line with ISO 13485:2016 requirements. And also it includes responsibilities for IVDR.
Article 10(8) – Imposes the obligation for manufacturers to establish and maintain compliant QMS.
Annex IX / XI – QMS assessment is a part of conformity procedures including Notified Bodies.
NBs will check your QMS during the process of conformity assessment.
Choose Notified Body: Choose and contract a Notified Body (NB), which has designation appropriate for your type of device.
Article 48 – Specifies the situation when the involvement of NB is necessary.
Annex IX / X / XI – Routes of observance assessment depending on the classification and documentation strategy.
The early engagement is very important because of the limited number of NBs' resources.
Acquire Data for Performance Evaluation: There are three pillars of the evidence based performance evaluation:
Scientific Validity Report
Analytical Performance Specifications
Clinical Performance
Annex XIII – Specifies requirements for the performance evaluation and Performance Evaluation Report (PER).
It is a core evidence requirement according to IVDR.
Prepare PMS and Vigilance Plans: You'll have to perform proactive monitoring and analysis of device performance after its placing on the market.
Annex III – Specifies structure of PMS plan and PSUR requirements.
Articles 78 to 81 – Provide the information regarding PMS requirements depending on the classification (e.g., PMS Reports for Class A/B and PSUR for Class C/D).
PMS is no longer optional, it's mandatory, structured and risk based.
Appoint Economic Operators: If your company is not based in the EU, appoint an EU Authorised Representative (EC REP) and specify responsibilities of your importers and distributors.
Article 11 – EU Licensed Representative
Article 13 – Importer commitments
You'll have to guarantee the monitorability and compliance through your supply chain.
UDI and labelling Compliance: It is important to comply with the requirements of the UDI and labeling. To do this update your device labels and packaging in accordance with the GSPR and UDI requirements.
Annex I, Section 20 – Specifies requirements for labels and information.
Annex VI – Specifies the structure and application of UDI (Unique Device Identifier).
UDI provides traceability and should be registered in EUDAMED.
Submit for Conformity Assessment: After preparation of all the necessary documentation submit your application to the Notified Body.
Annex IX, X, XI – Depending on your conformity assessment route.
CE marking must be done after reviewing and approval of the NB for Class B, C, and D.
Although there are some Class A contaminated devices which can be self certified, others require thorough assessment by NB.
9. Performance Evaluation Requirements
The performance evaluation is mandatory under IVDR for all classes of IVDs and is elaborated in Annex XIII, Article 56,57,58.
Scientific validity report: Relation of the analyte with the clinical condition (for example gene mutation and disease risk)
Analytical Performance specifications: Refers to the ability of the test in detecting/measuring the analyte intended by the test.
Clinical Performance: It is about how well the test works in a clinical setup.
Manufacturers need to prepare a Performance Evaluation Report supported by continuous data from Post Market Performance Follow Up Activities.
10. Technical Documentation under the Regulation on In Vitro Diagnostic
The regulation on IVDR provides that the technical documentation should be more complete and structured than under the directive. The format of this documentation is defined. It is set out in Annex II. Of the EU regulation No. 2017/746.
Key elements are:
device description and specifications,
design and manufacturing information,
labelling and IFU samples,
risk management documentation,
performance evaluation documentation,
PMS and PMPF plans,
UDI assignment and traceability,
declarations of observance and certificates,
For review by the Notified Body and Competent Authorities, this document should be current and accessible. To obtain permissions in time, it is important to have a clear structure and enough information. It is important to keep current documents. Proper structure and completeness are essential for getting approvals, from the Notified Body and Competent Authorities.
11. Post Market Surveillance and Vigilance Responsibilities
A PMS system that is functional and risk based should be established by all manufacturers according to the IVDR.
The following are key PMS components:
Post Market Surveillance Plan (Annex III Part B)
Periodic Safety Update Report (PSUR) – mandatory for Class C & D
Reporting trends in minor adverse events and potential adverse events
Reporting adverse incidents to Competent Authorities
Field Safety Corrective Actions and Field Safety Notice
These procedures guarantee continuous adherence to IVDR and patients’ safety throughout the lifespan of a device.
12. Timeline and deadlines of IVDR
A new set of regulations concerning the In Vitro Diagnostic Devices took effect on May 26 2022. Though, some companies producing In Vitro Diagnostic Devices have been granted additional time in preparation before compliance. The additional time depends on which type of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Directive is manufactured by such companies. And if they hold appropriate certificate documents according to the regulation of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Directive.
Key dates to know:
Device Category | Old Deadline | New Deadline |
|---|---|---|
Class D devices | 26 May 2025 | 31 December 2027 |
Class C devices | 26 May 2026 | 31 December 2028 |
Class B devices | 26 May 2027 | 31 December 2029 |
Class A sterile devices | 26 May 2027 | 31 December 2029 |
Class A non sterile devices | Already under IVDR (from 26 May 2022) | Already under IVDR (from 26 May 2022) |
New devices / devices with significant change | Already under IVDR (from 26 May 2022) | Already under IVDR (from 26 May 2022) |
13. Language & Labelling Requirements under IVDR
Labelling (Chapter III, Section 20.2) and language requirements (Article 37) are more strict under the IVDR to support patient safety and traceability across the EU.
Labelling must include:
UDI DI and UDI PI codes in compliance with Annex VI.
Name/trade name of the device.
Manufacturer’s name, registered trade name/mark, and address (plus an Authorized Representative’s details if applicable).
Importer’s contact information (if device is placed on the EU market by an importer).
Lot number or serial number for Monitoring.
Date of manufacture or expiry date where applicable.
Special storage or handling conditions if required.
Sterile indicator and method of sanitation if applicable.
Warnings or limitations that are necessary for safe use.
Intended purpose of the device.
Symbols as per harmonized standards (EN ISO 15223-1), ensuring clarity without translation where possible.
Language considerations: Article 37 Language requirements
Translation into official EU languages: All instructions for use IFU, labels, and safety information must be provided in the official languages of the EU Member State where the device is made available to the user or patient.
Clear and understandable: The language used must be clear and easily understood by the intended user, whether a layperson or healthcare professional.
14. EUDAMED Requirements
The European Database on Medical Devices is the main EU IT system developed with the purpose of ensuring transparency and improving coordination of information concerning medical devices and in vitro diagnostic devices. EUDAMED is the main platform that includes the manufacturer, the Authorized Representative, importer, distributor, Notified Body, and Competent Authorities. All of them register, exchange and control the information. That is all according to the IVDR regulation.
Core Requirements in In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR)
EUDAMED requirements are mainly described in Articles 25 to 34 of the IVDR - Regulation EU (2017/746) and annexes to them. The main requirements include:
Actor Registration
Registration under EUDAMED is mandatory for importers, manufacturers, and authorized representatives.
Every individual actor gets assigned a Single Registration Number for identifying purposes.
Reference: Article 28.
UDI Database
The data on Unique Device Identification has to be entered into the EUDAMED database.
Manufacturers should register the Unique Device Identification Device Identifier and the details of the device for the Unique Device Identification.
Reference: Articles 24 to 27, Annex VI.
Device Registration
Certificates from Notified Bodies must be entered into the EUDAMED database.
Information such as device identification, risk classification, intended use, information about the manufacturer, and certificates is an example of information.
Reference: Article 26.
Certificates and Information on Notified Bodies
Certificates from Notified Bodies must be entered into the EUDAMED database.
This provides for transparency and traceability of conformity assessments.
Reference: Article 51(5).
Clinical/Performance Study Data
A module dedicated for registration of clinical and performance studies of IVDs is available on EUDAMED.
It covers applications, authorizations, variations, and outcomes.
Reference: Articles 57 to 77.
Post Market Surveillance & Vigilance
Trend reports, PSUR, field safety corrective actions, and serious incidents have to be submitted to EUDAMED by manufacturers.
Commission and Competent Authorities use this data for safety assessment and monitoring.
Reference: Articles 82 to 87.
Authorities' Market Surveillance Activities
Competent Authorities register their market surveillance activities, such as inspections and audits, in EUDAMED.
Reference: Article 93 to 100.
Other posts
Don't let European red tape stall your vision. We simplify complex EU building regulations so you can focus on creation. Explore our blog for the clarity you need during your project and the insights required for post completion compliance. Read on for smoother approvals and smarter builds across Europe.